Creating fully branded user experiences shouldn’t require weeks of design effort or fragile scraping workflows. At Brand.Dev, we make personalization fast, scalable, and effortless; whether you're building custom onboarding, client-facing portals, or white-labeled dashboards.
For developers and product teams who need reliable, structured, and embeddable brand data, the right API can make or break the UX. While both Brandfetch and Brand.dev offer access to branding data, the scope, reliability, and integration focus differ significantly.
In this side-by-side comparison, we break down the differences in architecture, use cases, data coverage, and pricing to help you choose the best fit for your product stack.
🧠 What Is Brand.Dev?
Brand.Dev is an API-first platform that instantly extracts visual identity data from any domain: logos, fonts, color palettes, metadata, and industry classification. It’s engineered for software platforms to seamlessly personalize UI elements at scale.
Key Use Cases:
Dynamic theming of onboarding experiences
Branded dashboards for each client or user
Auto-filled design templates in creator tools
Custom microsites, reports, or embeddable widgets with native styling
Unlike general enrichment tools, Brand.Dev zeroes in on visual identity. It's built with low-latency, high-availability, and developer-first flexibility in mind.
⚙️ Feature Comparison: Brand.Dev vs. Brandfetch
Feature Category | Brand.Dev | Brandfetch |
Core Focus | Visual brand identity extraction | Company enrichment via public data |
Data Returned | Logos, fonts, colors, social links, addresses, metadata, NAICS | Logos, fonts, colors, social links, descriptions, addresses |
Branded Banners | Extracts company specific branded banner assets | Generic company banner images |
Color Palette | Primary + secondary brand colors | Basic palette (fewer customization options) |
Logo Formats | SVG + PNG (multi-size, high-res) | Primarily PNG/JPG (lower resolution) |
Error Tolerance | Fallback strategies and retries built-in | More likely to return incomplete results on edge cases |
Engineer's Note: Brandfetch sometimes struggles with domains lacking strong metadata or with multi-brand parent sites. Brand.Dev uses fallback strategies, HTML/CSS parsing, and a redundant architecture to extract core visual data even in sparse environments.
💸 Pricing and Usage Flexibility*
Plan Tier | Brand.Dev | Brandfetch |
Starter | $29/month for 1K calls @ 120 RPM
| $129/month for 2K calls @ no RPM guarantee
|
Growth | $99/month for 15K calls @ 300 RPM
| $516/month for 10K calls @ no RPM guarantee
|
Scale | $949/month for 250k @ 1,200 RPM
| N/A |
*Figures derived from monthly billing cycle
Brand.Dev offers guaranteed RPM (requests per minute) limits, lower cost-per-call, and more predictable usage-based billing, which is crucial for high-scale or bursty use cases like user onboarding or report generation.
🎯 Takeaways
Data Depth: Brand.dev delivers the visual identity elements product teams actually use; fonts, colors, logos; where Brandfetch leans more toward general company enrichment and marketing use cases.
Engineering Fit: With better error handling, fallback logic, and faster response times, Brand.Dev is more dependable in production-grade workflows.
Bang for Your Buck: Brand.Dev gives you more data, more calls, and faster performance for less money, especially at scale.
Use Case Alignment: If your goal is branded user experiences, rather than business enrichment or social links, Brand.Dev is purpose-built for that job.
Brandfetch is perfect for agencies trying to monitor brands while Brand.dev is built by developers for developers.
🚀 Start Creating Branded Experiences Instantly
👉 Book a demo or get your API key and start transforming onboarding, dashboards, and more—fully branded in seconds.